Journal of Health Sciences & Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True?

N Shubhashini, Gourav K Sahu, Shivani Consul, KJ Nandakishore, Md Idris

Citation Information : Shubhashini N, Sahu GK, Consul S, Nandakishore K, Idris M. Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True?. J Health Sci Res 2016; 7 (2):51-57.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10042-1035

Published Online: 00-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Sahu GK, Consul S, Nandakishore KJ, Shubhashini N, Geeta IB, Idris Md. Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True? J Health Sci Res 2016;7(2):51-57.


PDF Share
  1. Mechanical preparation of root canals: Shaping goals, technique and means. Endod Top 2005 Mar;10(1):30-76.
  2. Mastering endodontic instrumentation. 2007.
  3. An analysis of clinical breakage 1 of root canal instruments. J Endod 1998 Feb;14(2):75-82.
  4. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997 Feb;23(2):77-85.
  5. Effect of rotational speed on nickel-titanium file distortion. J Endod 1999 Nov;25(11):752-754.
  6. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2000 Mar;26(3):156-160.
  7. Endodontic canal preparation rotation vs reciprocation. Endod Pract 2012 Jan;5(1):56.
  8. The balanced force’ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985 May;11(5):203-211.
  9. Histomorphometric comparison of canal prepared by four techniques. J Endod 1992 Nov;18(11):530-534.
  10. Effects of four NiTi preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001 Apr;34(3):221-230.
  11. The effects of canal master Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. J Endod 1991 Feb;17(2):59-65.
  12. Instrumentation of curved molar root canal with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987 Oct;13(10):479-489.
  13. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types. J Endod 1995 Jun;21(6):300-304.
  14. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1992 Jan;18(1):19-24.
  15. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique. J Endod 1992 Jan;18(1):32-36.
  16. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod 1986 Jul;12(7):293-300.
  17. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. Part II. J Endod 1988 May;14(5):224-228.
  18. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals. J Endod 1989 Jun;15(6):240-245.
  19. Effect of coronal-radicular flaring on apical transportation. J Endod 1991 Apr;17(4):147-149.
  20. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 2002 Apr;28(4):316-321
  21. Shaping ability of the M4 handpiece and safety Hedstrom files in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 1997 Jan;30(1):16-24.
  22. Comparison instrumentation reamers and files versus a flat-sided design of conventional noninterrupted, flat-sided design. J Endod 2004 Feb;30(2):107-109.
  23. Canal preparation using only one NiTi rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008 Apr;41(4):339-344.
  24. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010 Dec;36(12):1991-1994.
  25. Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):157-159.
  26. com/literature
  27. tulsadentalspecialities.com/
  28. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012 Jun;38(6):850-852.
  29. Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation. Endod Pract Today 2008 Fall;2(3):193-197.
  30. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system. Roots 2011;1: 28-33.
  31. Wave One instruments: Clinical application guidelines. Endod Pract 2011 Nov:45-54.
  32. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating Ni-Ti instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012 Nov;37(4):220-227.
  33. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012 May;45(5):449-461.
  34. The wave one single file reciprocating system clinical technique. Roots 2011;(1):28-33.
  35. Canal preparation using one reciprocating instrument without prior hand filing: A new concept. Int Dent SA - African Edition 2:78-87.
  36. vdw-dental.com/fileadmin/redaktion/downloads/product/en/en-reciproc-anwender_95_2006.pdf
  37. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008 Aug;34(8):1406-1409.
  38. Current challenges and concepts of the thermo mechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013 Feb;39(2):163-172.
  39. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of profile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008 Nov;34(11):1406-1409.
  40. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010 Dec;43(12):1063-1068.
  41. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012 Oct;38(10):1408-1411.
  42. Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012 Jul;45(7):614-618.
  43. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002 Nov;28(11):765-769.
  44. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 Oct;102(4):e106-114.
  45. Cyclic fatigue of endo-sequence and K3 rotary files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2007 Dec;33(12):1469-1472.
  46. Low cycle fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments of various cross-sectional shape. Int Endod J 2007 Aug;40(8):626-632.
  47. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of four different NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2013 Feb;39(2):258-260.
  48. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi instruments used in complex curvatures with continuous or reciprocating rotation. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia 2014 Nov;28(2):87-90.
  49. Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod 2013 Jul;39(7):906-909.
  50. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filling and canal master techniques. J Endod 1991 Jun;17(6):275-279.
  51. J Conservative Dent 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):89-93.
  52. Effects of two nickel-titanium instruments systems. Mtwo versus ProTaper Universal, on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2011 Oct;37(10):1412-1416.
  53. Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod 2010 Jul;36(7):1238-1240.
  54. Influence of reciprocating single-file and rotary instrumentation on bacterial reduction on infected root canals. Int Endod J 2013 Nov;46(11):1083-1087.
  55. Bacterial removal promoted by 2 single-file systems: WaveOne and One Shape. J Endod 2014 Dec;40(12):1995-1998.
  56. Int J Sci Study 2015 May;3(2):105-108.
  57. Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system. A comparative study. J Endod 2012 Apr;38(4):505-509.
  58. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012 Jan;38(1):101-104.
  59. Centering ability and influence of experience when using WaveOne single-file technique in simulated canals. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 7 pages.
  60. Shaping ability of WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod 2014 Sep;40(9):1468-1471.
  61. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: Reciprocation versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013 Apr;39(4):501-504.
  62. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different singlefile systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013 Aug;39(8):1054-1056.
  63. Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths. J Endod 2011 Apr;37(4):522-525.
  64. Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments to the root canal anatomy. Scanning 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):246-251.
  65. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2014 Aug;40(8):1228-1230.
  66. Nonsurgical re-treatment. J Endod 2004 Dec;30(12):827-845.
  67. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2013 Oct;46(10):942-945.
  68. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. J Endod 2014 Apr;40(4):543-546.
  69. Effectiveness of rotatory and reciprocating movements in root canal filling material removal. Braz Oral Res 2015;29(1):1-6.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.