Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True?
N Shubhashini, Gourav K Sahu, Shivani Consul, KJ Nandakishore, Md Idris
Citation Information :
Shubhashini N, Sahu GK, Consul S, Nandakishore K, Idris M. Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True?. J Health Sci Res 2016; 7 (2):51-57.
Sahu GK, Consul S, Nandakishore KJ, Shubhashini N, Geeta IB, Idris Md. Rotary Endodontics or Reciprocating Endodontics: Which is New and Which is True? J Health Sci Res 2016;7(2):51-57.
Effect of rotational speed on nickel-titanium file distortion. J Endod 1999 Nov;25(11):752-754.
Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2000 Mar;26(3):156-160.
Endodontic canal preparation rotation vs reciprocation. Endod Pract 2012 Jan;5(1):56.
The balanced force’ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985 May;11(5):203-211.
Histomorphometric comparison of canal prepared by four techniques. J Endod 1992 Nov;18(11):530-534.
Effects of four NiTi preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001 Apr;34(3):221-230.
The effects of canal master Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. J Endod 1991 Feb;17(2):59-65.
Instrumentation of curved molar root canal with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987 Oct;13(10):479-489.
A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types. J Endod 1995 Jun;21(6):300-304.
A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1992 Jan;18(1):19-24.
Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique. J Endod 1992 Jan;18(1):32-36.
A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod 1986 Jul;12(7):293-300.
A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. Part II. J Endod 1988 May;14(5):224-228.
A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals. J Endod 1989 Jun;15(6):240-245.
Effect of coronal-radicular flaring on apical transportation. J Endod 1991 Apr;17(4):147-149.
A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 2002 Apr;28(4):316-321
Shaping ability of the M4 handpiece and safety Hedstrom files in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 1997 Jan;30(1):16-24.
Comparison instrumentation reamers and files versus a flat-sided design of conventional noninterrupted, flat-sided design. J Endod 2004 Feb;30(2):107-109.
Canal preparation using only one NiTi rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008 Apr;41(4):339-344.
Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010 Dec;36(12):1991-1994.
Alternating versus continuous rotation: A comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010 Jan;36(1):157-159.
com/literature
tulsadentalspecialities.com/
Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012 Jun;38(6):850-852.
Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation. Endod Pract Today 2008 Fall;2(3):193-197.
The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system. Roots 2011;1: 28-33.
Wave One instruments: Clinical application guidelines. Endod Pract 2011 Nov:45-54.
A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating Ni-Ti instruments in simulated curved canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012 Nov;37(4):220-227.
Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012 May;45(5):449-461.
The wave one single file reciprocating system clinical technique. Roots 2011;(1):28-33.
Canal preparation using one reciprocating instrument without prior hand filing: A new concept. Int Dent SA - African Edition 2:78-87.
Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008 Aug;34(8):1406-1409.
Current challenges and concepts of the thermo mechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013 Feb;39(2):163-172.
Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of profile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008 Nov;34(11):1406-1409.
Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010 Dec;43(12):1063-1068.
Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012 Oct;38(10):1408-1411.
Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 2012 Jul;45(7):614-618.
Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 Oct;102(4):e106-114.
Cyclic fatigue of endo-sequence and K3 rotary files in a dynamic model. J Endod 2007 Dec;33(12):1469-1472.
Low cycle fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments of various cross-sectional shape. Int Endod J 2007 Aug;40(8):626-632.
Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of four different NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2013 Feb;39(2):258-260.
Cyclic fatigue of NiTi instruments used in complex curvatures with continuous or reciprocating rotation. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia 2014 Nov;28(2):87-90.
Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod 2013 Jul;39(7):906-909.
A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filling and canal master techniques. J Endod 1991 Jun;17(6):275-279.
J Conservative Dent 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):89-93.
Effects of two nickel-titanium instruments systems. Mtwo versus ProTaper Universal, on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2011 Oct;37(10):1412-1416.
Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod 2010 Jul;36(7):1238-1240.
Influence of reciprocating single-file and rotary instrumentation on bacterial reduction on infected root canals. Int Endod J 2013 Nov;46(11):1083-1087.
Bacterial removal promoted by 2 single-file systems: WaveOne and One Shape. J Endod 2014 Dec;40(12):1995-1998.
Int J Sci Study 2015 May;3(2):105-108.
Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system. A comparative study. J Endod 2012 Apr;38(4):505-509.
Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012 Jan;38(1):101-104.
Centering ability and influence of experience when using WaveOne single-file technique in simulated canals. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 7 pages.
Shaping ability of WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod 2014 Sep;40(9):1468-1471.
Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: Reciprocation versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013 Apr;39(4):501-504.
The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different singlefile systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013 Aug;39(8):1054-1056.
Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths. J Endod 2011 Apr;37(4):522-525.
Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments to the root canal anatomy. Scanning 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):246-251.
Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2014 Aug;40(8):1228-1230.